Future Energy eNews IntegrityResearchInstitute.org Feb. 15, 2007
Converting geothermal heat into electricity by pouring water onto hot rocks underground and using the steam to turn turbines is arguably the most promising - and renewable - source of "green" energy on the planet. So concludes the MIT experts' report, released on Monday, which examines what geothermal energy could do for the US in the 21st century.
The 18-member panel calculated that there is more than enough extractable hydrothermal energy available to generate the entire 27 trillion kilowatt-hours of energy consumed in the US in 2005. In fact, a conservative estimate of the energy extractable from the hot rocks less than 10 kilometres beneath American soil suggests that this almost completely untapped energy resource could support US energy consumption, at its current clip, for more than two millennia to come.
Developing a new generation of geothermal plants is thus a top priority for tackling global warming, the panel says. "By any kind of calculation, this is an extremely large resource that is technically accessible to us right now," says the study's lead author, Jefferson Tester. "It doesn't require new technology to get access to it. And there's never going to be a limitation on our ability to expand this technology because of limits of the resource."
An 18-member panel led by MIT prepared the 400-plus page study, titled "The Future of Geothermal Energy" (PDF, 14.1 MB). Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, it is the first study in some 30 years to take a new look at geothermal, an energy resource that has been largely ignored.
The goal of the study was to assess the feasibility, potential environmental impacts and economic viability of using enhanced geothermal system (EGS) technology to greatly increase the fraction of the U.S. geothermal resource that could be recovered commercially.
Although geothermal energy is produced commercially today and the United States is the world's biggest producer, existing U.S. plants have focused on the high-grade geothermal systems primarily located in isolated regions of the west. This new study takes a more ambitious look at this resource and evaluates its potential for much larger-scale deployment.
"We've determined that heat mining can be economical in the short term, based on a global analysis of existing geothermal systems, an assessment of the total U.S. resource and continuing improvements in deep-drilling and reservoir stimulation technology," said panel head Jefferson W. Tester, the H. P. Meissner Professor of Chemical Engineering at MIT.
"EGS technology has already been proven to work in the few areas where underground heat has been successfully extracted. And further technological improvements can be expected," he said.
The expert panel offers a number of recommendations to develop geothermal as a major electricity supplier for the nation. These include more detailed and site-specific assessments of the U.S. geothermal resource and a multiyear federal commitment to demonstrate the concept in the field at commercial scale.
The new assessment of geothermal energy by energy experts, geologists, drilling specialists and others is important for several key reasons, Tester said.
First, fossil fuels--coal, oil and natural gas--are increasingly expensive
and consumed in ever-increasing amounts. Second, oil and gas imports from
foreign sources raise concerns over long-term energy security. Third, burning
fossil fuels dumps carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere.
Finally, heat mining has the potential to supply a significant amount of the
country's electricity currently being generated by conventional fossil fuel,
hydroelectric and nuclear plants.
The study shows that drilling several wells to reach hot rock and connecting them to a fractured rock region that has been stimulated to let water flow through it creates a heat-exchanger that can produce large amounts of hot water or steam to run electric generators at the surface. Unlike conventional fossil-fuel power plants that burn coal, natural gas or oil, no fuel would be required. And unlike wind and solar systems, a geothermal plant works night and day, offering a non-interruptible source of electric power.
Prof. Tester and panel member David Blackwell, professor of geophysics at Southern Methodist University in Texas, also point out that geothermal resources are available nationwide, although the highest-grade sites are in western states, where hot rocks are closer to the surface, requiring less drilling and thus lowering costs.
The panel also evaluated the environmental impacts of geothermal development, concluding that these are "markedly lower than conventional fossil-fuel and nuclear power plants."
"This environmental advantage is due to low emissions and the small overall footprint of the entire geothermal system, which results because energy capture and extraction is contained entirely underground, and the surface equipment needed for conversion to electricity is relatively compact," Tester said.
The report also notes that meeting water requirements for geothermal plants
may be an issue, particularly in arid regions. Further, the potential for
seismic risk needs to be carefully monitored and managed.
According to panel member M. Nafi Toksöz, professor of geophysics at MIT, "geothermal energy could play an important role in our national energy picture as a non-carbon-based energy source. It's a very large resource and has the potential to be a significant contributor to the energy needs of this country."
Toksöz added that the electricity produced annually by geothermal energy systems now in use in the United States at sites in California, Hawaii, Utah and Nevada is comparable to that produced by solar and wind power combined. And the potential is far greater still, since hot rocks below the surface are available in most parts of the United States.
Even in the most promising areas, however, drilling must reach depths of 5,000 feet or more in the west, and much deeper in the eastern United States. Still, "the possibility of drilling into these rocks, fracturing them and pumping water in to produce steam has already been shown to be feasible," Toksöz said.
Panel member Brian Anderson, an assistant professor at West Virginia University, noted that the drilling and reservoir technologies used to mine heat have many similarities to those used for extracting oil and gas. As a result, the geothermal industry today is well connected technically to two industry giants in the energy arena, oil and gas producers and electric power generators. With increasing demand for technology advances to produce oil and gas more effectively and to generate electricity with minimal carbon and other emissions, an opportunity exists to accelerate the development of EGS by increased investments by these two industries.
Government-funded research into geothermal was very active in the 1970s and early 1980s. As oil prices declined in the mid-1980s, enthusiasm for alternative energy sources waned, and funding for research on renewable energy and energy efficiency (including geothermal) was greatly reduced, making it difficult for geothermal technology to advance. "Now that energy concerns have resurfaced, an opportunity exists for the U.S. to pursue the EGS option aggressively to meet long-term national needs," Tester observed.
Tester and colleagues emphasize that federally funded engineering research and development must still be done to lower risks and encourage investment by early adopters. Of particular importance is to demonstrate that EGS technology is scalable and transferable to sites in different geologic settings.
In its report, the panel recommends that:
Besides Tester, Blackwell, Toksöz and Anderson, members of the panel include: geomechanics expert Anthony Batchelor, managing director of GeoScience Ltd. in the United Kingdom; reservoir engineer Roy Baria from the United Kingdom; geophysicists Maria Richards and Petru Negraru at Southern Methodist University; mechanical engineer Ronald DiPippo, an emeritus professor at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth; risk analyst Elisabeth Drake at MIT; chemist John Garnish, former director of geothermal programs of the European Commission; drilling expert Bill Livesay; economist Michal Moore at the University of Calgary in Canada, former California energy commissioner and chief economist at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory; commercial power conversion engineer Kenneth Nichols; geothermal industry expert Susan Petty; and petroleum engineering consultant Ralph Veatch Jr. Additional project support came from Chad Augustine, Enda Murphy and Gwen Wilcox at MIT.
A version of this article appeared in MIT Tech Talk on January 24, 2007 (download PDF).
MIT News Office
The Future of Geothermal Energy Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century - (full report, 14.1 MB, PDF file)
Jefferson W. Tester - MIT Department of Chemical Engineering
More: Chemistry and chemical engineering
More: Earth and atmospheric sciences
A new electromagnetic toothbrush combines sound and light to provide multiple benefits to the teeth and gums.
Visible and Infrared light-emitting diodes (LEDs) pulsing at 4 MHz ultrasonic frequency for effective tooth whitening, reduction in gum bleeding and gingivitis, and antibacterial and rejuvenating effects within centimeters below the gum line.
The Pro-Medic Professional Toothbrush Multiplex Energy Technology uses advanced patented acousto-optic technology (U.S. Patents Pending 10/846,886 and 11/135,939) coupled with patented dual sonic frequency technology (U.S. Provisional Patent 60/730,820) to provide multiplicative effects to oral care.
Ergonomic design and Non-Slip handle for more controlled brushing
Nanotechnology Antibacterial material on the bristle
Brushing option (manual) with only light and ultrasound for sensitive teeth or gums
4MHz ultrasound Blue & IR Light Emitting Diodes MicroPulsar & MacroOscillator at Sonic Frequencies Nanotechnology Antibacterial Treatment on the bristle head Non-Slip TPE handle Two more bristle heads include Rechargeable battery Dual Voltage 110/220V 60/50 Hz Charger included Manual Limited 1-year warranty
Mr. Howard Bloom = International Paleopsychology Project
Dr. Dennis Bushnell = NASA
Dr. Eric Chaisson = Wright Center for Innovative Science Education
Mr. Russ George = CEO, Planktos
Dr. Jerome Glenn = AC/UNU/Millennium Project
Mr. Gustov Grob = International Clean Energy Consortium
Dr. Martin Hoffert = NYU Physics Dept.
Dr. Feng Hsu = NASA
Dr. Thorsten Ludwig = Technical University of Berlin
Mr. John C. Mankins = Space Power Association
Dr. Fabrizio Pinto = Interstellar Tech. Corp.
Mr. Darel Preble = Chair, Space Solar Power Institute
Sir Crispin Tickell = Chancellor, University of Kent
Dr. Thomas Valone = President, Integrity Research Institute
Dr. Craig Venter = The Center for Advancement of Genomics
Dr. Paul Werbos = National Science Foundation
Seminar, Symposia, and Workshop Series
The Foundation For the Future convenes annual Humanity 3000 seminars and bi-decadal symposia. The seminars typically convene 25 to 35 participants. The first symposium, in August 2000, brought together 70 scholars from 40 disciplines and 20 countries. In addition, smaller workshops are conducted periodically to provide a knowledge base for seminar and symposia participants.
Virtually all physical, biological, and social sciences are represented in Humanity 3000 dialogues, which are focused on human life in the thousand-year future. Each seminar is designed to be an exercise in creative and contemplative thought, and every effort is made in the selection of participants to ensure a wide representation of worldviews.
The purpose of each seminar is to facilitate a free exchange of ideas about the future of our species, with an emphasis on informed understanding of what science tells us about the key factors that may affect the long-term future of humanity, as well as how the scientific view integrates into the whole. Participants not only identify and explore these key factors, but also map the past and current territory, and attempt to outline the future trajectory of each factor, as currently understood, in view of foreseeable future problems and opportunities.
Humanity 3000 participants are asked to address the following: In the context of Homo sapiens' evolutionary past, present, and thousand-year future:
What are the threats to the survival of humanity?
What are the opportunities that offset/mitigate the threats?
What are the emergent priorities to ensure the future well-being of humanity?
Scholars interested in participating in seminars and/or symposia are invited to contact the Foundation for additional information:
1151 Triton Dr. Suite C
Foster City, CA 94404
925 W. Georgia St. #145,
Vancouver, BC V6C 3L2
Russ George, CEO
William G. Coleman, COO/Marketing
Michael Chinn, CFO/CIO
David Kubiak, Communications